Ronseal approach is best

As I said only a few days ago, we have possibly just witnessed history in the making, as the American Democrat voters in New Hampshire signal their intent to help Hillary Clinton become the first female President.

Well I think that's what I predicted. OK, I admit that this paragraph will change many times between now and 'Super' Tuesday, with the words "black" and "female" being interchangeable from caucus to caucus.

I did mention the other day that encouraging voters to barack Obama, might not be the most productive means of creating the right kind of atmosphere for success, and having watched his post defeat speech (actually oratory is more accurate, for this man actually has the power to "engage" a crowd, more than any other American politician since Clinton - Bill not Hilary, or Kennedy) his campaign organisers should carefully consider whether Obama's campaign slogan - "We want change!" should be used after he has won the previous caucus.

In Iowa, Barack Obama won handsomely; "We want change!" chanted (or barracked) his supporters in New Hampshire, and they got it with a Hilary Clinton victory.

Now it's not rocket science, (Unless you work for NASA) but I always prefer the Ronseal approach ("it does what it says on the tin") and whilst not particularly pithy, Obama's supporters should "spice" it up and be asked to shout: -

"we'll tell you who we want, who we really, really want, a ziga a ziga, a Barack Obamahhhhhhhhhh!!!"